Briefs ready for review, drafted and sourced by AI agents.
You send the case file and a dictated note. AI agents managed by Luca Diaz Hilterscheid organise the facts with page references, draft the brief and verify every citation at the primary source. You receive a complete Word package in your firm’s format.
Your letterheadDraft for review
In the matter of
[GEGENSEITE] v [MANDANT]
concerning a purchase-price claim
Statement of defence
A. Facts
The defendant gave prompt notice of the defects in the goods (p. 47 of the file).
Evidence testimony of [ZEUGE 1], Exhibit B 3.
B. Legal assessment
The claim under section 433 (2) BGB is met by the defence under section 320 (1) BGB.
File analysis
Organise facts and add page references.
p. 47 of the file
Drafting
Prepare the brief in your firm’s format.
Firm format
Source checks
Verify citations at primary sources.
Citation verified
Packaging
Assemble documents and the change list.
Exhibit B 3
Criminal defence
The public prosecutor had announced an indictment and discontinued the proceedings under section 170 (2) of the German Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO).
- Proceedings
- An investigation into alleged misuse of titles and forgery of documents
- Work product
- A defence brief with every citation verified at source and a numbered exhibit bundle
- Time frame
- Prepared within days
- Employment law
- A further matter, details confidential.
Only the approved wording is published. We do not name parties, courts or case numbers.
View referencesWhat arrives on your desk.
You receive the complete draft with its sources and exhibits, as a good drafting assistant would present it.
Delivery 2
- Statement-of-defence.docx
- Fact-summary.docx
- Exhibit-index.docx
- Change-list.docx
Beispiel AG v Musterfirma GmbHVersion 2
Fact summary
| No. | Fact | File |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supply contract concluded | p. 12 |
| 2 | Goods delivered | p. 31 |
| 3 | Notice of defects received, witness Max Mustermann | p. 47 |
| 4 | Delivery date contradictory | pp. 31, 88 |
Exhibit indexB 1 to B 4
Defendant’s exhibits
| Exhibit | Description | Para. |
|---|---|---|
| B 1 | Supply contract | 1 |
| B 2 | Delivery note | 1 |
| B 3 | Notice of defects | 2 |
| B 4 | Inspection report | 4 |
Change listVersion 2
What has changed
Changed
- Para. 4 redrafted after your dictation
- Exhibit B 4 added, references updated
Unchanged
- Fact summary
- Previously verified citations
Your format
Word files on your letterhead, structured the way the court expects.
Verified citations
Every decision and every statute is checked at the primary source.
One fact summary
Every fact carries a page reference. Contradictions and gaps are identified.
Complete revisions
Every revised package replaces the previous package in full.
A named contact
Luca Diaz Hilterscheid is personally responsible for every engagement.
We replace names before any AI system processes the file.
Every engagement includes a confidentiality agreement under section 43e BRAO and a data processing agreement under Article 28 GDPR.
Handover
Witness Max Mustermann confirms receipt of the notice of defects.
You send the case file by email.
Placeholders
Witness [ZEUGE 1] confirms receipt of the notice of defects.
Before any AI system processes the file, we replace names and identifiers such as IBANs, email addresses, telephone numbers, case numbers and dates of birth with placeholders.
Processing
Witness [ZEUGE 1] confirms receipt of the notice of defects.
The AI agents see only the version with placeholders. The AI providers do not use the material to train their models.
Placeholders onlyDelivery
Witness Max Mustermann confirms receipt of the notice of defects.
Your Word files come back with the real names.
Mapping, kept only by us
- [MANDANT]
- Musterfirma GmbH
- [ZEUGE 1]
- Max Mustermann
The AI providers do not receive this mapping.
If you replace the names yourself.
You can also replace names and identifiers with placeholders yourself before you send the file. We then work with your placeholders and return the documents with the same placeholders.
The process in seven steps.
Each round of your comments leads to a new, complete package.
- Instruction
- Facts
- Draft
- Verification
- Delivery
- Your changesYour step
- Strategy memo
You send the file, dictate and review. The process asks nothing more of you.
The process in detailHow to begin.
Name the practice area, document and scope. We then agree the next steps.